On the one hand, the art was pretty and the story wasn't too bad and I could tell the people apart (always a bonus). The two main people bickered (which normally I really like, but here was just so-so). The dark-haired guy was a badass sometimes, so that was nice. Neither one was the "girl" or the "guy" really, which is always a bonus.
On the other hand, "topping" and "bottoming" don't have to be permanent positions. I don't know why so many people/stories insist they always are. It's stupid to think that someone is naturally one way or the other (of course some people definitely prefer one or the other and may always or mostly have sex in a particular way, but I take issue with the implication - or direct statement - that someone MUST always be one or the other). Also, jumping unconscious people? Bad. Pushing ahead even if the other person is very reluctant? Bad. Lust? Not the same as love. These things aren't awful necessarily, but the author didn't pull them off in a very interesting way. It just gets kind of old, I guess.
It could have been better. The art was very nice, but the story was so...cliche, I guess. I've seen it before a lot, and it didn't even have a really good take on it. I was a bit disappointed, honestly.
NOTE: Gattaca88, I do know that some men prefer one position over another and may always have sex on the 'top' or 'bottom.' Sometimes people (straight, gay, female, male) just have their preferences. As I mentioned above, what I don't like is the implication or statement that it HAS to be one or the other, that it's basically a biological thing, and that topping or bottoming necessarily implies other things about people (like how masculine or feminine or strong or smart they are). Those things are often done in stories, and that gets irritating after the thousandth time I've seen it. But this is just my opinion. You are allowed to have your own.